|
Post by goldhunter on Jul 9, 2021 7:21:31 GMT -5
I thought this was sort of interesting. I found it in a post from 2004 about image 3 (which is widely believed to be Roanoke.)
"hey guys,
i had read on here somewhere that a few of you contacted Byron Priess and he had confirmed locations for you, i reemmber Huston being one of them. Well i emailed hgim and asked if Boston contained a casque, and he wouldnt confirm anything. he said: "no.i cannot confirm anything. i can only reply to pictures of the casques." so did he really confirm to you that there is one in Huston? because if he did, then thats pretty crappy that he wont confirm or deny to me that there is one in Boston. let me know"
|
|
|
Post by choice on Jul 9, 2021 16:28:33 GMT -5
Reply to that post a couple of hours later says it all:
loph, I think, and this is only my opinion, that we burnt BP out with questions. This is the second to last email I got from him: "there is a treasure in houston. that's all i can tell you." This is the last email I received from him: "really, i don't think i can answer any more questions."
wilhouse
|
|
|
Post by canuck on Jul 9, 2021 18:02:27 GMT -5
Yep, Byron was truthful with the first question and then when hounded with more just told wilhouse whatever he thought would get him off his back.
|
|
|
Post by goldhunter on Jul 9, 2021 19:10:17 GMT -5
Thanks, guys.
Yeah, that would've been a tough one for Mr. Preiss knowing there WAS a casque in Boston but not associated with the image being discussed.
|
|