Post by rubyfelixir on May 23, 2023 22:02:56 GMT -5
D. BIRD
Three buildings of anything with create a triangle, that is nothing mind blowing that's a fact of the value of three. On a region of various chateaus it would not be earth shattering to find three that head almost held a regular shaped triangle.
A chateau in France is not like a noble house in England, it's not even a castle.
ME
A golden triangle. 72, 72, and 36, degrees.
Three old chateau forts.
D. BIRD
Most of them were forts, no different to stately homes in England. And the claim if 72, 72 and 36. I would take protractor to your image as it's not that precise.
ME
Precise? Compared to what? On what scale?
D. BIRD
Scale is scale, makes no difference to scale, you can't change the number of degrees in triangle by the scale of an image.
ME
What I mean, is that your argument about precision is not fair to the time in which the chateaus were built. It is easier now to make a geometrically accurate shape that uses features and buildings in a land-scape by using a modern satellite map image to choose points for the geometric construction, than it was to attempt to do the same task a thousand years ago across kilometres of un-even ground, using the technology available at that time, to produce an accurate shape at that size.
D. BIRD
So you use the supposed fact that it's 72, 72, 36 to validate the discovery, but when that is shown not to be true you say it can't be accurate because it would be impossible to be that accurate. So basically the 72, 72 and 36 isn't a fact then?
ME
You need to look at what can be achieved, and what was intended, and how one affects the result of the other.
Your position, as a result of your argument, will be an impossible Zeno scenario for the degree of the precision of the geometric shape.
D. BIRD
Just trying an experiment. Back in a bit.
Three buildings of anything with create a triangle, that is nothing mind blowing that's a fact of the value of three. On a region of various chateaus it would not be earth shattering to find three that head almost held a regular shaped triangle.
A chateau in France is not like a noble house in England, it's not even a castle.
ME
A golden triangle. 72, 72, and 36, degrees.
Three old chateau forts.
D. BIRD
Most of them were forts, no different to stately homes in England. And the claim if 72, 72 and 36. I would take protractor to your image as it's not that precise.
ME
Precise? Compared to what? On what scale?
D. BIRD
Scale is scale, makes no difference to scale, you can't change the number of degrees in triangle by the scale of an image.
ME
What I mean, is that your argument about precision is not fair to the time in which the chateaus were built. It is easier now to make a geometrically accurate shape that uses features and buildings in a land-scape by using a modern satellite map image to choose points for the geometric construction, than it was to attempt to do the same task a thousand years ago across kilometres of un-even ground, using the technology available at that time, to produce an accurate shape at that size.
D. BIRD
So you use the supposed fact that it's 72, 72, 36 to validate the discovery, but when that is shown not to be true you say it can't be accurate because it would be impossible to be that accurate. So basically the 72, 72 and 36 isn't a fact then?
ME
You need to look at what can be achieved, and what was intended, and how one affects the result of the other.
Your position, as a result of your argument, will be an impossible Zeno scenario for the degree of the precision of the geometric shape.
D. BIRD
Just trying an experiment. Back in a bit.