|
|
Post by robjohnson on Aug 2, 2018 8:53:49 GMT -5
From The Wolf - This is now the second time Mr. Fenn has explicitly stated ONLY WWWH is the first clue. At one time many a year ago I considered the 9 sentences were the 9 clues. I quickly dropped that flawed logic once it was confirmed but some still insist it is a possibility. He is rarely this clear about things, but for argument sake, if the second sentence is the first clue, then why has he now twice stated that it is only WWWH and and not the whole sentence is the first clue?
If someone can prove this without rationalization I am all ears.
|
|
|
|
Post by robjohnson on Aug 2, 2018 8:55:30 GMT -5
Agreed Wolf. This can help us count the other clues. But we should still evaluate our thoughts.
For example, "If you've been wise and found the blaze." One clue (or two) in past tense. And what order or clue number is the sentence, or phrase? By the way, I think the blaze is in the book (uh oh, here comes an avalanche).
I think it's best to keep an open mind about the chase.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikemarcum879 on Aug 2, 2018 9:41:19 GMT -5
Agreed Wolf. This can help us count the other clues. But we should still evaluate our thoughts. For example, "If you've been wise and found the blaze." One clue (or two) in past tense. And what order or clue number is the sentence, or phrase? By the way, I think the blaze is in the book (uh oh, here comes an avalanche). I think it's best to keep an open mind about the chase. Ff talks about him self in stanza 1 So he starts at a location where. He is giving you duration to a location that brings you to a halt sense it is WATERS.they are many that comes to this .halt. |
|
The Wolf
Finding Forrest Fenn
content...
Posts: 797 
|
Post by The Wolf on Aug 4, 2018 22:48:51 GMT -5
Rob, IMO all options should be considered as you suggest, until Fenn proves it wrong and then it is time to scratch it off the list and move on. Stubbornness (often rationalized as tenacity), ego and a refusal to adjust can kill a searcher or keep their searching wheels spinning in mud. The blaze may be in the book, I believe it is with a Fenn twist.
|
|
|
|
Post by seannm on Aug 5, 2018 9:49:26 GMT -5
All,
Stubbornness is sometimes confused with tenacity.f
Seannm
|
|
|
|
Post by mikemarcum879 on Aug 5, 2018 10:21:49 GMT -5
All, Stubbornness is sometimes confused with tenacity.f
Seannm I'm guilty.😂 |
|
|
|
Post by seannm on Aug 5, 2018 11:02:04 GMT -5
All, Stubbornness is sometimes confused with tenacity.f
Seannm I'm guilty.😂 mikemarcum879, Aren't we all? And what about that 200ft searcher, did they give up or "move on" from the correct interpretation because of a lack of confidence or tenacity? That is unfortunate, at least for them. Seannm |
|
|
|
Post by seannm on Aug 5, 2018 11:09:02 GMT -5
Rob, IMO all options should be considered as you suggest, until Fenn proves it wrong and then it is time to scratch it off the list and move on. Stubbornness (often rationalized as tenacity), ego and a refusal to adjust can kill a searcher or keep their searching wheels spinning in mud. The blaze may be in the book, I believe it is with a Fenn twist. Haha nice, after the fact, edit to fit ones narrative. |
|
|
|
Post by mikemarcum879 on Aug 5, 2018 11:14:27 GMT -5
mikemarcum879, Aren't we all? And what about that 200ft searcher, did they give up or "move on" from the correct interpretation because of a lack of confidence or tenacity? That is unfortunate, at least for them. Seannm No I believe the searcher that got within the 200ft mark from there and ended up where he started from. |
|
|
|
Post by seannm on Aug 5, 2018 11:20:03 GMT -5
mikemarcum879, Aren't we all? And what about that 200ft searcher, did they give up or "move on" from the correct interpretation because of a lack of confidence or tenacity? That is unfortunate, at least for them. Seannm No I believe the searcher that got within the 200ft mark from there and ended up where he started from. mikemarcum879, I don't understand your response, can you reword it? Thanks. Seannm |
|
|
|
Post by mikemarcum879 on Aug 5, 2018 11:32:05 GMT -5
No I believe the searcher that got within the 200ft mark from there and ended up where he started from. mikemarcum879, I don't understand your response, can you reword it? Thanks. Seannm I believe the meek was turned around.We don't know if this searcher or a few that have been a meek a very a baying person. Will turn around not that your in any trouble just this area will lead back from where started from. |
|
