|
|
Post by heidini on Oct 16, 2018 8:10:04 GMT -5
This is a play titled “too far to walk” from 2002 about sisters separated. I am not sure if it is a book also. I found this awhile ago. All I could remember was sisters being separated. My google search was “ too far to walk sisters.” robertckelly.co.uk/shows/too-far-to-walk/ |
|
|
|
Post by Bownarrow on Oct 16, 2018 10:21:55 GMT -5
Once I found my WWWH, and the meaning of the rest of stanza II, it became clear that the answers to the other "directional clues" followed very simply and logically from one another.
|
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on Oct 17, 2018 1:28:35 GMT -5
Hi Wolf: no, no, not mine. Way before my time. Look on Richard's site back in I think May 2013? Post by Babylon Slim. I dont understand the context. “In a word, (insert a word here)” is a common phrase. I thoughtl Forrest was just latching onto it (because he saw he was able to use it in a tricky way). Is it possible that a searcher also used the phrase without Forrest seeing it? Astree: the fact remains that we have multiple instances of Forrest reusing comments from searchers, in this case a year later. (More recently he has had much faster turn-around time). Yes, "In a word ... yes" is a pretty short, innocuous, common four-word combo. Nevertheless, I don't think it's a coincidence. |
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on Oct 17, 2018 1:32:04 GMT -5
Question: "Is the blaze one single object?" - Scout Around
Answer: "in a word yes" - FF In a w o r d = crossword puzzle? Wasn't there a poster who once went by the name..... "Scout Around?"
Yes.... Scout Around is a name used by a poster...and who asked the Question. It's pretty common knowledge that "Scout around" was one of Diggin' Gypsy's alternate names. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2018 6:19:08 GMT -5
Yes.... Scout Around is a name used by a poster...and who asked the Question. It's pretty common knowledge that "Scout around" was one of Diggin' Gypsy's alternate names. Ok it is one single object . I said physical object. The blaze doesn't point in any duration. Because it's round. |
|
|
|
Post by Jenny on Oct 17, 2018 7:43:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lookinup on Oct 17, 2018 8:12:23 GMT -5
The truth is actually and way too often becoming "stranger than fiction" in its transparencies.
|
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on Oct 17, 2018 23:57:15 GMT -5
It's pretty common knowledge that "Scout around" was one of Diggin' Gypsy's alternate names. Ok it is one single object . I said physical object. The blaze doesn't point in any duration. Because it's round. Mike: that's one assumption, but not a good one. If the solution is ever revealed, I expect you will discover that the blaze is decidedly NOT round. |
|
|
|
Post by astree on Oct 18, 2018 5:36:44 GMT -5
Ok it is one single object . I said physical object. The blaze doesn't point in any duration. Because it's round. Mike: that's one assumption, but not a good one. If the solution is ever revealed, I expect you will discover that the blaze is decidedly NOT round. Zaphod. Thanks for your previous response. Completely agree with your not round statement. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2018 20:57:03 GMT -5
Question: "Is the blaze one single object?" - Scout Around
Answer: "in a word yes" - FF
In a w o r d = crossword puzzle?
Wasn't there a poster who once went by the name..... "Scout Around?"
In a word - YES consider chapter MY BACK YARD E nvironmentally S ustainable Y ard if you've seen Forrest's back yard now.. Umm..yeah.. it's a BLAZE alright  |
|
|
|
Post by drpepperwood on Nov 5, 2018 1:01:06 GMT -5
Hidden letters in words. Like to add that did you know that to far too walk is a title of a Mormon book?
|
|
|
|
Post by npsbuilder on Nov 5, 2018 2:05:25 GMT -5
The way I see it is that the Blaze is 2 fold once you know what you are looking for and it is staring you in the face when you are at the place where the map starts. The rabbit hole I'm in at this point (current thinking) for the Blaze has 2 parts to it IMO. This fits with my train of thought for my map and still crawling deeper into the rabbit hole.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2018 4:49:38 GMT -5
The way I see it is that the Blaze is 2 fold once you know what you are looking for and it is staring you in the face when you are at the place where the map starts. The rabbit hole I'm in at this point (current thinking) for the Blaze has 2 parts to it IMO. This fits with my train of thought for my map and still crawling deeper into the rabbit hole. You won't understand what the blaze looks like until you are standing at if you been wise. |
|
|
|
Post by heidini on Nov 5, 2018 7:46:33 GMT -5
The way I see it is that the Blaze is 2 fold once you know what you are looking for and it is staring you in the face when you are at the place where the map starts. The rabbit hole I'm in at this point (current thinking) for the Blaze has 2 parts to it IMO. This fits with my train of thought for my map and still crawling deeper into the rabbit hole. 2 fold- like 2 meanings? I think I said something like this before. Geographic/ physical site and then another “meaning.” I think you have to solve both to solve the poem. |
|
|
|
Post by goldwatch on Nov 6, 2018 23:14:37 GMT -5
The way I see it is that the Blaze is 2 fold once you know what you are looking for and it is staring you in the face when you are at the place where the map starts. The rabbit hole I'm in at this point (current thinking) for the Blaze has 2 parts to it IMO. This fits with my train of thought for my map and still crawling deeper into the rabbit hole. You won't understand what the blaze looks like until you are standing at if you been wise. Maybe not even then. |
|
