Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 5:49:21 GMT -5
Don't want to forget about....."Todo." Does the TTOTC have to memoir in it. If you take a friend leave them in the car. Well that could mean it's not that far from where ff parks his car. Or it's for legal questions that could come up. If you take a friend in there with you they have the right to claim half of the TC. Forrest,only says friend not family members. He didn't say if you take someone leave them in the car. |
|
|
|
Post by goldwatch on Dec 7, 2018 10:56:15 GMT -5
Does the TTOTC have to memoir in it. If you take a friend leave them in the car. Well that could mean it's not that far from where ff parks his car. Or it's for legal questions that could come up. If you take a friend in there with you they have the right to claim half of the TC. Forrest,only says friend not family members. He didn't say if you take someone leave them in the car. I think he actually said "searching partner." My take is that if they are a searcher too, then you are gambling that they won't just take the treasure for themselves if they find it first. |
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on Dec 7, 2018 17:24:34 GMT -5
If you take a friend leave them in the car. Well that could mean it's not that far from where ff parks his car. Or it's for legal questions that could come up. If you take a friend in there with you they have the right to claim half of the TC. Forrest,only says friend not family members. He didn't say if you take someone leave them in the car. I think he actually said "searching partner." My take is that if they are a searcher too, then you are gambling that they won't just take the treasure for themselves if they find it first. Yes, searching partner. As I recall, the quote was close to: "If you have a searching partner, best to have them wait in the car." The advice seems strange since he has been insistent in his safety comments not to go into the wilderness alone: two at a minimum, and 3 or 4 is better (his words, to the best of my memory without computer access). So the apparent inconsistent advice seems to hinge on what he really means by "searching partner." A pet dog? A competitor (as suggested above)? Surely not a spouse or your kids. More eyes (and hands) are better than two. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 17:27:24 GMT -5
I think he actually said "searching partner." My take is that if they are a searcher too, then you are gambling that they won't just take the treasure for themselves if they find it first. Yes, searching partner. As I recall, the quote was close to: "If you have a searching partner, best to have them wait in the car." The advice seems strange since he has been insistent in his safety comments not to go into the wilderness alone: two at a minimum, and 3 or 4 is better (his words, to the best of my memory without computer access). So the apparent inconsistent advice seems to hinge on what he really means by "searching partner." A pet dog? A competitor (as suggested above)? Surely not a spouse or your kids. More eyes (and hands) are better than two. I'll buy that. |
|
|
|
Post by goldwatch on Dec 7, 2018 22:09:13 GMT -5
Yes, searching partner. As I recall, the quote was close to: "If you have a searching partner, best to have them wait in the car." The advice seems strange since he has been insistent in his safety comments not to go into the wilderness alone: two at a minimum, and 3 or 4 is better (his words, to the best of my memory without computer access). So the apparent inconsistent advice seems to hinge on what he really means by "searching partner." A pet dog? A competitor (as suggested above)? Surely not a spouse or your kids. More eyes (and hands) are better than two. I'll buy that. Yep. Me too. It would be an entirely different meaning had he had said "search partner", minus the "ing", and inferring an actual honest partnership in your search. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 5:04:05 GMT -5
Yep. Me too. It would be an entirely different meaning had he had said "search partner", minus the "ing", and inferring an actual honest partnership in your search. Some searchers might think the TC is on Indian land. Well it could be but scrape book 195 is miss leading you Imo. There's the word MOVEMENT,and ARRESTED. IMO Forrest is playing head games with us to make one think if I move the TC where I think it is then I could be arrested. Scrape book 195 Imo is a rabbit hole. This is for the searchers that thinks the TC is hid on Indian land. |
|
|
|
Post by goldwatch on Dec 8, 2018 10:57:45 GMT -5
Yep. Me too. It would be an entirely different meaning had he had said "search partner", minus the "ing", and inferring an actual honest partnership in your search. Some searchers might think the TC is on Indian land. Well it could be but scrape book 195 is miss leading you Imo. There's the word MOVEMENT,and ARRESTED. IMO Forrest is playing head games with us to make one think if I move the TC where I think it is then I could be arrested. Scrape book 195 Imo is a rabbit hole. This is for the searchers that thinks the TC is hid on Indian land. Yeah, I don't think it's on any land where a searcher can get in trouble with the law. Forrest may have stretched the law, as he says, but he doesn't break it. I guess we should add, "intentionally." He's had a very active life so he probably has dealt with those points that run into the shaded area between what the law is and what it isn't. He's not going to lead people into trouble with the law or with danger. That doesn't make any sort of sense to do that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 11:18:15 GMT -5
Some searchers might think the TC is on Indian land. Well it could be but scrape book 195 is miss leading you Imo. There's the word MOVEMENT,and ARRESTED. IMO Forrest is playing head games with us to make one think if I move the TC where I think it is then I could be arrested. Scrape book 195 Imo is a rabbit hole. This is for the searchers that thinks the TC is hid on Indian land. Yeah, I don't think it's on any land where a searcher can get in trouble with the law. Forrest may have stretched the law, as he says, but he doesn't break it. I guess we should add, "intentionally." He's had a very active life so he probably has dealt with those points that run into the shaded area between what the law is and what it isn't. He's not going to lead people into trouble with the law or with danger. That doesn't make any sort of sense to do that. I've all ways thought there's a sign repersenting from there it's not place for the meek. The sign that's in the canyon I'm in not far in the canyon is a warning sign because deeper in the canyon it gets dangerous. This ant breaking the law but it's a warning for the meek. |
|
|
|
Post by goldwatch on Dec 8, 2018 12:13:13 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't think it's on any land where a searcher can get in trouble with the law. Forrest may have stretched the law, as he says, but he doesn't break it. I guess we should add, "intentionally." He's had a very active life so he probably has dealt with those points that run into the shaded area between what the law is and what it isn't. He's not going to lead people into trouble with the law or with danger. That doesn't make any sort of sense to do that. I've all ways thought there's a sign repersenting from there it's not place for the meek. The sign that's in the canyon I'm in not far in the canyon is a warning sign because deeper in the canyon it gets dangerous. This ant breaking the law but it's a warning for the meek. Just remember, Forrest was 80 years old when he hid it. And I don't think he'd put people at risk anyways. I think "meek" has some other meaning than danger. Some reference to literature, or some other thing like that, maybe. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 14:17:43 GMT -5
I've all ways thought there's a sign repersenting from there it's not place for the meek. The sign that's in the canyon I'm in not far in the canyon is a warning sign because deeper in the canyon it gets dangerous. This ant breaking the law but it's a warning for the meek. Just remember, Forrest was 80 years old when he hid it. And I don't think he'd put people at risk anyways. I think "meek" has some other meaning than danger. Some reference to literature, or some other thing like that, maybe. I wonder if Joe Meek has anything to do with Forrest hiding the TC. Didn't Joe meek escape from the Indians I think Joe meek traveled 16 miles in his escape., What if Forrest hid the TC 16 miles from his house Forrest would have to escape from where he hid the TC to get back home Ski Santa fe is 16 miles from Forrest fenn house. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 17:39:00 GMT -5
Just remember, Forrest was 80 years old when he hid it. And I don't think he'd put people at risk anyways. I think "meek" has some other meaning than danger. Some reference to literature, or some other thing like that, maybe. I wonder if Joe Meek has anything to do with Forrest hiding the TC. Didn't Joe meek escape from the Indians I think Joe meek traveled 16 miles in his escape., What if Forrest hid the TC 16 miles from his house Forrest would have to escape from where he hid the TC to get back home Ski Santa fe is 16 miles from Forrest fenn house. My solve is wrong ski Santa fe is only 8 miles 2 years for nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on Dec 8, 2018 18:00:37 GMT -5
Just remember, Forrest was 80 years old when he hid it. And I don't think he'd put people at risk anyways. I think "meek" has some other meaning than danger. Some reference to literature, or some other thing like that, maybe. I wonder if Joe Meek has anything to do with Forrest hiding the TC. Didn't Joe meek escape from the Indians I think Joe meek traveled 16 miles in his escape., What if Forrest hid the TC 16 miles from his house Forrest would have to escape from where he hid the TC to get back home Ski Santa fe is 16 miles from Forrest fenn house. No, I don't think Joe Meek (or Molly Brown, as long as we're naming names) has anything to do with the Chase. Both are specialized knowledge. |
|
