|
|
Post by Jenny on May 26, 2020 16:09:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by goldilocks on May 26, 2020 16:17:14 GMT -5
Wow... ask a simple question, get a simple answer. Thanks Martha and Jenny....and f of course!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2020 16:29:14 GMT -5
Yes, thank you both and f of course. It's always good to hear from f.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jenny on May 26, 2020 16:31:46 GMT -5
Overcooking....
Don't complicate it....
|
|
|
|
Post by davebakedpotato on May 26, 2020 17:09:50 GMT -5
Excellent!
|
|
|
|
Post by davebakedpotato on May 26, 2020 17:11:23 GMT -5
So much for Robert Redford's book...
|
|
|
|
Post by Balboa on May 26, 2020 17:29:51 GMT -5
OMG, he did answer. Thank you Forrest, you made my day shine. In the recent past, someone mentioned the 24 in a post and I thought it would be an good question to ask. So much for the three minute egg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jenny on May 26, 2020 17:40:04 GMT -5
So much for Robert Redford's book... The Outlaw Trail? |
|
|
|
Post by jdiggins on May 26, 2020 19:56:20 GMT -5
Forrest, since there are 24 poem lines and 24 hours in a day, does the poem have something to do with time, even if it is metaphorical?
Martha Pemegano
No Martha, it does not. You are overcooking the poem. f
Caps used: NMY
Nmy phonetically is enemy.
Time is the enemy?
Time was in the trash...
Wasted time?
M:
"...does the poem have something to do with time,..."
F:
"...You are overcooking..."
Is a statement of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by seannm on May 26, 2020 20:01:09 GMT -5
So much for Robert Redford's book... LOL! I guess the same can be said for all the other books mentioned or hinted at (cough) in TTOTC. Power up for “the” poem purist! 😁 Seannm |
|
|
|
Post by crm114 on May 26, 2020 20:38:07 GMT -5
Too much time in the heat = overcooking.
|
|
|
|
Post by harrytruman on May 26, 2020 20:45:32 GMT -5
So much for Robert Redford's book... LOL! I guess the same can be said for all the other books mentioned or hinted at (cough) in TTOTC. Power up for “the” poem purist! 😁 Seannm He also might be saying that those who observe that there are X of something in the poem (e.g., lines or sentences) and X of something else (e.g., clues) -- and then go on to claim that this is more than mere coincidence -- are "overcooking the poem." I could be wrong about that. But I think I'm not. |
|
|
|
Post by seannm on May 26, 2020 20:59:29 GMT -5
LOL! I guess the same can be said for all the other books mentioned or hinted at (cough) in TTOTC. Power up for “the” poem purist! 😁 Seannm He also might be saying that those who observe that there are X of something in the poem (e.g., lines or sentences) and X of something else (e.g., clues) -- and then go to claim that this is more than mere coincidence -- are "overcooking the poem." I could be wrong about that. But I think I'm not. "It's not just a sentence, its a craft" f lummifilm.com/AUDIO/doug.mp3It would be great if Forrest would come out and definitively state that the nine sentences in the poem are not the nine clues that he refers to in the line just prior to the poem, but he has not. Therefore all we have is conjecture. But maybe you could ask Jenny to ask for you. I would love for Forrest himself to give me some direct and definitive confirmation that my methodologies and theories were wrong. Until then, my path is true. Seannm |
|
|
|
Post by goldilocks on May 26, 2020 21:00:45 GMT -5
If the poem has nothing to do with time does that also eliminate the theory that the clues might be chronological or contiguous in time as they appear in the poem? Or that the omegas have no relevance to time?
|
|
|
|
Post by zaphod73491 on May 26, 2020 23:17:52 GMT -5
So Jenny, you're not a little bit suspicious that a 3-year-in searcher appears here out of nowhere, and then asks a question for you to forward to Forrest, and it's answered almost immediately? As Anna Graham (whose avatar reveals her theme of poem focus) pointed out on THOR today, "Martha Pemegano" is an anagram of "Anagram the poem." So at the very least, Martha (like Anna) is a fan of poem anagramming.
|
|
